Thermal Mass

April 15th, 2009 by Seldom

In our climate, even on the hottest days of summer, the outdoor nighttime temperature drops below the indoor temperature. Using massive materials inside the insulated envelope, we can take advantage of that diurnal temperature swing to reduce the amplitude of the indoor temperature swings. The mass absorbs heat during the day and radiates it back at night.  If we do a good job of keeping that mass shaded during the summer there’s no need for mechanical cooling and the dog has a nice cool floor to lie on.

Thermal Inertia
Talking about thermal mass in more detail gets a little more complicated. I’m afraid we’re going to need a few definitions:

  • Heat capacity is the ability of a material to absorb heat.
  • Diffusivity is a measure of the speed heat moves thru a material.
  • Effusivity describes the ability of a material to exchange heat with it’s surroundings. It is similar to emissivity (as in low-e or low emissivity windows).

Good materials for thermal storage have high thermal inertia.  They have a high heat capacity, but low diffusivity and effusivity.  Metals don’t work well for thermal storage.  They can take on a lot of heat because they have a high heat capacity, but they can’t store it very long because they also have high diffusivity and effusivity.  Metal heats up quickly, but it gives it right back. Clay is much better for storing heat in a timeframe that’s useful for conditioning houses.  It has a high heat capacity, but low diffusivity and effusivity. It’ll take all day to heat up a cold earthen floor sitting in a room with a warm air temperature, but it will take all night for it to radiate that heat back. That’s what we’re looking for.

mathis

Even when the two items are identical in temperature, the metal feels colder. Why? Wood is not a good conductor of heat, so it is slow to absorb the heat from your hand. Metal has higher thermal effusivity, so the heat from your hand flows into the metal quickly – creating the sensation of it feeling cold.

Mathis Instruments

In our climate massive construction is awesome in the summer. The downside is that dense materials like tile, concrete, and compressed earth block also feel cool to the touch during the winter. That’s why European stone castle walls are covered with tapestries.

Mean Radiant Temperature
To derive your Mean Radiant Temperature, look around you and take the temperature of every surface you see. You are exchanging heat with all of those surfaces. Surfaces warmer than you radiate heat to you and all the other colder surfaces. You’re just another room surface exchanging heat with all the others. To be comfortable all the surfaces around you need to be within a few degrees of each other (and you), and in a well insulated house with good windows they will be. However, believe it or not, our skin does not have good temperature sensors. Instead, we have excellent heat flux sensors. All of the surfaces in a room can be exactly the same temperature, and some will still feel colder than others when we touch them. The surfaces that feel colder are the ones with higher effusivity. The castle tapestries have low effusivity so they feel warmer than high effusivity stone.

Radiant Heating
In a typical (minimally insulated and drafty) house, radiant floor heating feels great because the mass is heated up to about 80 deg F. The floor radiates heat up to other surfaces, and brings the mean radiant temperature up so we’re nice and toasty. The problems are:

  1. radiating 80 deg F from the entire floor is a lot of heat.  A house that needs that much heat is wasting a lot of energy, and it should be insulated better.
  2. you lose a lot of ability for a slab to absorb free heat coming in the windows from the sun if the mass has already been heated by radiant tubing.

In an efficient well sealed house, a conventional concrete radiant floor heating slab won’t have to rise above about 73 deg F to meet the heating load (assuming the entire floor is heated). You will wonder if the heat is really on because it won’t feel warm. Even though the floor slab is adding heat to the house and the mean radiant temperature is high enough that we aren’t radiating much heat to the other surfaces, concrete has a relatively high effusivity. It exchanges heat with us pretty easily and feels cool even with a slight temperature difference. In a passive solar house, high effusivity materials located in areas that get direct solar gain will feel tactically warm on sunny days, but those same materials in northern rooms without solar exposure or in southern rooms on cloudy days won’t.

Recommendations
If you use radiant heat, insulate the house well enough that a small area of radiant will heat the entire house. Locate it in northern rooms (especially bathrooms) that can’t be heated by the sun.

Concentrate high heat capacity materials in the south rooms where they will do the most good. Use low-medium effusivity materials to store heat. Assuming no radiant heat, a north bath or kitchen would be better off with low effusivity wood or cork floors and wood countertops, but the same room located on the south would benefit from medium effusivity concrete countertops and tile floors.  Likewise, soft earthen plasters will feel warmer than hard venetian lime plasters, and soft lime and gypsum plasters will feel warmer than harder cement based plasters.

This spreadsheet shows the effusivity and interface temperature (how warm the surface feels when you touch it) for a few typical materials. I assumed an 85 degree hand surface temperature and all other surfaces at 70 degrees, but you can go to the spreadsheet and change those values as you see fit: Google Docs | Thermal Effusivity.

Share

Tags: , , , ,

6 Responses to “Thermal Mass”

  1. Tom Hill says:

    Hello,

    What a fantastic and informative site! I’ve been trawling the internet for this sort of information for ages …

    I’ve been looking into an insulating material called Wallrock from this German company (www.erfurt-klimatec.com). I’m a little skeptical about how it claims to work and fear that it is basically greenwash. Essentially its a from of retrofit wall paper that is supposed to improve the thermal performance of a house.

    At only 3mm thick it doesn’t really work as an insulation material – though it may help improve air tightness a little. The manufacturer seems to be suggesting that it works by increasing the mean radiant temperature of the wall. However, while I agree that coating a concrete wall with wallrock would increase the interface temperature of the wall I’m skeptical that it will increase how warm the room feels when you’re sat in the middle of the room and not actually touching the wall … While the interface temperature may indeed be higher the real temperature should be fairly constant and as such the radiant temperature should remain unchanged.

    Any thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated!

    Many thanks,

    Tom

  2. Seldom says:

    Hi Tom.

    I have to agree that it looks like greenwash. Erfurt’s technical data sheet is spectacularly lacking when it comes to technical data.

    I’m certain it has no insulation value at 3 mm thick. If the substrate is a typical European cavity wall, it should work to make the a hard surface more comfortable like the tapestry on a stone castle wall I mentioned above. However, saving energy by improving comfort relies on the occupant turning down the thermostat, and all the studies I’ve read have found that rarely happens in the real world.

  3. Tom Hill says:

    Hi Seldom,

    Many thanks for your response. Greatly appreciated.

    I’ve been looking into this a little more. I agree that, at 3mm thick, the insulation benefit would be negligible.

    Taking two concrete wallsl (one with Wallrock, one without) if the room temperature is exactly the same then surely the surface temperature should be exactly the same? The only difference would be that the one with Wallrock would *feel* warmer to the touch. Therefore, would this make a difference to the Mean Radiant Temperature if the *real* temperature is the same.

    The main claim that Erfurt tout is that Wallrock acts as a ‘barrier’ and adjusts the heating profile of the room. I guess this is effectively converting it from your ‘south facing’ high thermal mass type of room to a more ‘north facing’ cork floor type room. If so it would theoretically decrease the thermal inertia slightly (allowing the room to heat up more quickly) but I suspect that the effects wouldn’t last for very long.

    Again, many thanks for your time,

    Tom.

  4. Jeff says:

    I think you’re spot on. Assuming a steady state room temperature the Wallrock wall and the concrete wall should have the same surface temperature, but the Wallrock will feel warmer if you’re in physical contact with it.

    Wallrock would lower diffusivity of the wall and slow it’s rate of heat absorbsion. Therefore, the mass of air in the room should heat up slightly faster because it’s not losing heat to the wall as fast. However, the amount of energy saved would be trivial. As soon as there is a temperature difference across the wall the thermal conductivity of the wall becomes the important factor for energy transfer.

    I think Wallrock would increase comfort if the substrate wall is a mass wall, but the only way it’s going to save energy is if the occupant’s comfort is so much better they turn down the thermostat.

  5. Tom Hill says:

    Thank you again for this.

    I concur with what you’ve both said. The science of this is quite confusing but I think I’ve managed to get my head around it now.

    By the way I found this link useful in explaining the ins and outs of what we’ve been discussing (http://dt.fme.vutbr.cz/enviro/Pohoda/thermal.htm). Might be of use to someone …

    Cheers again,

    Tom

  6. [...] Today,  JBS Construction was onsite excavating.  The extra dirt will be used to create compressed earthen blocks, which will be used in the floor and some interior walls for thermal mass. [...]

Leave a Reply