Which has a Bigger Footprint: Dogs or SUVs?

November 13th, 2009 by Seldom

In their new book, Time to Eat the Dog: The real guide to sustainable living, Robert and Brenda Vale explain that dogs and cats eat a lot of protein, and our agricultural practices have a big impact on the environment. Their research showed that the eco-footprint of a Land Cruiser driven 10,000 miles per year is about half that of a medium-sized dog.

27311601

New Scientist has a good summary of the study: Link

via Good

Share

One Response to “Which has a Bigger Footprint: Dogs or SUVs?”

  1. Christopher says:

    Why don’t we objectify our children as well and include the footprint of a 1 year old child. I’m not for an overpopulated world, but I’m more against a world without compassion. Dogs are not possessions.

Leave a Reply