Posts regarding ‘Climate Change’

Nauhaus Primer: Talking Head About Carbon Neutrality and the Nauhaus Prototype

June 5th, 2010 by Clarke

We recently recorded this video intended as a draft to help us work on our public spiel. It needs a lot of work, but I thought I’d post it anyway because it’s a fairly thorough introduction to what we’re doing generally and the prototype in particular.  Just pretend you’re in high school and lunch is next period…Go generic sports team with some sort of mammal as its mascot!


Carbon Neutrality and The Nauhaus Prototype from Clarke Snell on Vimeo.

  • Share/Bookmark

What if Its a Big Hoax?

February 14th, 2010 by Seldom

91

via Adam

  • Share/Bookmark

Healing Land Through Intensive Grazing

December 19th, 2009 by Seldom

Conventional wisdom says that overgrazing causes desertification of rangelands. Allan Savory says that’s dead wrong.

Plants have external digestive systems. We animals have microorganisms in our guts to break down food and make it useful to our cells, but plants don’t have that luxury. Their digestive bacteria and fungi live in the soil.

Savory divides the world into two areas:

Nonbrittle

In areas with a year-round high humidity, dead organism decay rapidly, and bare ground is quickly covered with vegetation. These areas cover about 1/3 of the planet’s land area.

Brittle

The other 2/3 of land area has prolonged dry seasons. During the dry season, plant matter dies, but the microorganisms that the plants need to digest that organic matter also die off. Instead of being digested, dead organic matter is standing. Since it doesn’t mulch the ground, the bare soil doesn’t retain moisture. New plants dry out before they get established.

In brittle environments, the bacteria in animal digestive tracks stays moist and alive during the dry season. Brittle environments require animals to build healthy soil. Before we humans screwed it up, massive buffalo herds in the US midwest would decimate the plant life in an area. However, at the same time they fertilized that area, and they moved on quickly allowing the plant life to recover. This cycle resulted in some of the thickest, richest top soil in the world in a semi-brittle environment.

Savory says overgrazing isn’t what’s turning brittle grass lands into deserts. A lack of animals is. In the US, the natural grazing animals are long gone, and for the most part our domesticated grazers don’t even live on the grasslands anymore. Our corporate industrial farming system has relegated grazing animals to hellish feed lots. Vast tracts of range land are left fallow, which most people would expect to be a good thing, but the plant life isn’t recovering. It’s digestive system is missing.

Smart land management in brittle environments mimics those natural buffalo herds and restores the land by intensely grazing it and moving the animals to new pastures often.

In this 1 hour presentation Savory goes into more detail and shows some convincing photographic evidence. He also argues that humans have been causing climate change because of this misunderstanding for a very long time.

For more information:

Savory’s website: 

Savory Institute

And his books:

Holistic Management Handbook:  Healthy Land, Healthy Profits, 2006

Holistic Management:  A New Framework for Decision Making, 1998

  • Share/Bookmark

Which has a Bigger Footprint: Dogs or SUVs?

November 13th, 2009 by Seldom

In their new book, Time to Eat the Dog: The real guide to sustainable living, Robert and Brenda Vale explain that dogs and cats eat a lot of protein, and our agricultural practices have a big impact on the environment. Their research showed that the eco-footprint of a Land Cruiser driven 10,000 miles per year is about half that of a medium-sized dog.

27311601

New Scientist has a good summary of the study: Link

via Good

  • Share/Bookmark

Arctic Sea Ice 1979 to 2009

November 1st, 2009 by Seldom

National Snow and Ice Data Center:

20091005_Figure3_thumb

  • Share/Bookmark

Passive Solar Design

October 28th, 2009 by Renee


This is the second article in a series originally written for New Life Journal.


By: Clarke Snell


Let’s not beat around the bush. In this day and age, heating and cooling our houses amounts to spending a lot of money to create a lot of pollution. That’s because most of the energy we use for this purpose comes from burning fossil fuels. What’s worse, as a society our response to skyrocketing oil and gas prices has been to keep making the skies dirtier. The weird thing about this whole scenario is that everything we’re burning is just stored solar energy.

Here’s the process: Plants turn sunlight into energy which is turned into living tissue. Animals eat the plants. Plants and animals die. Wait several hundred million years. Drill deep wells and dig big holes to access resultant oil, gas, and coal. Transport all over the planet and burn copiously until supply begins to get scarce. Fight wars and panic until lights go out and heat goes off.

I don’t know, wouldn’t it make better business sense to skip the “middle man” and go directly to the source, i.e. the sun? Duh. The technique is called passive solar design: the conscious manipulation of the sun’s direct energy to affect the temperature inside a building. It is clean burning, runs for free after installation, has no moving parts, comes with a lifetime guarantee, isn’t susceptible to power outages or unexpected supply shortages, requires no special maintenance, and can be accomplished by simply rearranging the materials used in a conventional modern house at little or no extra expense.

Though its most effective real world implementation is a beautiful dance between science and art, the concept behind passive solar design is elegantly simple: if you want heat, let the sun in; if you want cool, don’t let the sun in.

Our loving star has made the process so much easier by methodically changing its path through the sky throughout the year. In our region, the winter sun rises to the southeast, stays low in the sky to the south, and sets to the southwest. The summer sun rises to northeast, stays high in the sky most of the day, and sets to the northwest. This is an amazing stroke of luck because it means the sun is low in the sky when it’s cold outside and high in the sky when it’s hot outside. Low sun is easy to let into a building, while high sun tends to be blocked by the roof and other protrusions of the building itself. Perfect!

With this basic observation under our belts, we’re ready to realize a passive solar masterpiece. First, we need to find the right place to build. In our region, that means a site that will give us unobstructed access to the low southern winter sun. Some trees or other obstructions to the east and especially the west would be great to block the hot rising and setting summer sun. (A ridge or evergreens to the north might block some winter winds, but wind is very site specific so we’d have to spend some time on site to make that call.)

Next, we’ll design our building to let in a lot of winter sun and block a lot of summer sun. Building shape is the most basic parameter. In our area, the best shape is longer on the east-west axis, creating more wall surface on the south and less on the east and west.

The main avenue for sun to enter the building will be through glass. From a heating point of view, only south-facing glass will create a net solar heat gain, so other glass should be minimized. However, north, east, and west glass are an important part of our natural ventilation cooling and daylighting strategies. This is where the delicate interplay of science and art comes in, in other words we’ll find beautiful compromises.

The heating equation, in any case, is straightforward, we simply have to carefully match the square footage of our southern glass windows and doors to the amount of “thermal mass” we place in the building. Thermal mass simply means something that stores heat, so technically everything is a thermal mass. Dense heavy materials usually store heat well. Water, concrete, stone, and earth are good examples. A great place to put mass in a building is in a concrete or earthen floor. Sun flows in through glass covered openings and is stored in the mass of the floor. The mass sucks up heat, thus preventing the house from overheating during the day, then slowly releases the heat after the sun goes down keeping the house warm at night. The trick is creating the right balance. Science to the rescue! We have everything from rule of thumb glass to mass ratios to computer assisted thermal modeling at our disposal.

Next, we’ll need to design our roof overhangs and other protuberances so that they follow our mantra: block sun when it’s hot, let in sun when its cold. The poster child for this is the southern trellis covered with deciduous vines (grapes and hops are two options for you vintners and brewers out there). Thick leaf cover that blocks the sun in spring and summer dies back in fall and winter to let the sun through. Since we know where the cooperative sun will be in the sky at any time of year, roof and window overhangs can be sized to interact with the sun exactly as we like.  We’ll add covered patios on the east and west, again to block low hot sun, and one on the north to create an outdoor room that will be shaded all summer long.

Finally, we’ll work with the surrounding landscape to heighten our design. In tandem with our patios, we’ll add shade trees, especially to the west and north. Plants not only create shade, but evaporative cooling which is the natural technology mimicked by your refrigerator and clanking, polluting window A/C or HVAC unit. We’ll also create a focus to the south, perhaps placing an outdoor kitchen under the trellis with a kitchen garden in front of it. We’ll place doors and windows that encourage cross-ventilation and allow effortless transitions to outdoor rooms. Don’t forget that in our climate a little tweaking back and forth between sun and shade makes the outside comfortable for most of the year. Outdoor rooms are inexpensive access to the mansion of nature. Of course, we’ll also design a unified insulation strategy that includes measures to slow convective, conductive, and radiant heat loss through the building, but that’s another story.

Ta-da! A passive solar masterpiece that will supply a baseline of heat and cool at the right time of year which can then be enhanced to create the specific indoor environment of your choosing. Though you may not get the picture from this frantic overview, none of these design features need to control the look or feel of the building. Passive solar is flexible if you are. It’s a pivotal design concept, not an architectural gestalt.

Disagreement abounds even on some of the basics. For example, some people feel that our climate is too wet to allow for natural ventilation as a cooling strategy because open windows plus humidity can result in mold. In the end (here’s where you refer back to that lovingly pawed copy of my column from last month that’s taped to the fridge), the right approach to passive solar is going to have to match the specifics of who you are with the specifics of the place your house will sit.

I will however be unequivocal about one thing: you are going to heat and cool your house with solar energy one way or another. The only question is if you want it free and clean or expensive and dirty. This may sound like a laughably obvious choice, but a cursory glance at any cityscape or subdivision will show that the sun is presently laughing at us, not with us.

  • Share/Bookmark

Time Lapse Video of Receeding Glaciers

September 13th, 2009 by Seldom

If you’re in a hurry, skip to minute 7:00.

via TED.com

  • Share/Bookmark

Shai Agassi on Attacking Climate Change

April 27th, 2009 by Seldom

In 2007 Shai Agassi left his position as next in line for CEO at SAP to found Better Place.

When horrific climate-change scenarios elicit little but endless chatter from governments and entrenched special interests, the difference between talk and action represent an embarrassing gulf. Meet Shai Agassi, who has stepped fearlessly into that gap. His approach to solving the puzzle of electric automobiles could spark nothing short of an automotive revolution.

-TED.com

A two minute excerpt from Shai’s TED talk.

Watch the entire 18 minute presentation where he describes Better Place’s plan at TED.com

  • Share/Bookmark

Embodied energy and CO2 emitted in the production of some common items and building materials

March 30th, 2009 by hana

Here we have a kilogram to kilogram comparison of embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions during the production of some common items and building materials.  (The values for gasoline are not embodied energy/CO2 emissions of production, but energy and emissions produced by burning 1 kg of gas.)

Here we move on more specifically to building materials and put them in more recognizable building units.  For comparison, the energy and CO2 emitted in the production of the average American’s weekly food consumption and the energy and CO2 emitted by burning 1 gal of gas are provided.

Next, we compare wall-building materials.  Here we see some growing trade-offs in embodied energy and CO2 emissions, although distinct advantages can be seen in some building materials over others.  (CO2 emissions for Adobe unavailable.)

Finally, some insulating materials (adjusted to different thicknesses to achieve an R value of 10).  Here there are clear winners among the alternative insulating materials.  (Also notice the CO2 emissions differences between HFC-foamed and CO2-foamed polystyrene.)

Data from:

  • Share/Bookmark

Climate Change – anatomy of a myth

March 24th, 2009 by Seldom

This is about the claim that climate scientists were predicting a new ice age in the 70s, and therefore should not be listened to now. The guy that made it is a science journalist from Australia.

In the October 23, 2006 edition Newsweek published an update:

More than 30 years later, that little story is still being quoted regularly—as recently as last month on the floor of the Senate by Republican Sen. James Inhofe, chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee and the self-proclaimed scourge of climate alarmists. The article’s appeal to Inhofe, of course, is not its prescience, but the fact that it was so spectacularly wrong about the near-term future…

Peter Gwynne, the author of the original 1975 Newsweek article, had this to say when asked if he would change anything if he could have a do over:

“I think possibly the only thing would be to add, ‘These things are never fixed in stone, the fact that there has been cooling in the early part of the century doesn’t mean that will continue,’ but I could have written that on the end of any science story I ever wrote. That’s kind of the nature of science and that’s why I ultimately decided not to do it.”

The guy that made the video has a couple more about the basics of climate change:

  1. Climate Change — the scientific debate
  2. Climate Change — the objections
  • Share/Bookmark