Notice: Undefined variable: has_ut in /home/thenauhaus/public_html/blog/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/aioseop.class.php on line 480

Building Green: Chapter 15 – Creating a Connection

Daily Water Use

April 10th, 2009 by Seldom

Good Magazine has a good graphic showing relative water use of daily activities. This is just a corner of it. Click to view the whole thing

water-use

Avoiding meat saves a LOT more water than a low flow shower head or toilet.

Growing corn requires a lot of water too:

A gallon of ethanol, depending on irrigation practices, might require up to 2,100 gallons of water to produce. While, in areas more suited to corn production, it can take as little as 100 gallons of water to produce a gallon of ethanol. The worst news of all of this, is that from 2005 to 2008 water use for ethanol production increased 246%, whereas U.S. bioethanol production has increased only 133%. This means that corn ethanol production has pushed into land that is not well-suited for growing corn, thus increasing water use far more than it increased yield.

Ecogeek

Share

Mercury in CFLs

April 5th, 2009 by Seldom

Compact florescent lamps get a bad rap because they contain mercury which gets released into the air when a lamp breaks. However, in America where we make the majority of our electricity from coal, even if you manage to break every CFL you use at the end of its life (which is likely at the landfill if you throw them away), you still release less mercury into the air than using incandescents. Of course, it’s hardly a fair comparison at this point because incandescents will be illegal soon anyway.

578px-cfl_bulb_mercury_use_environmentsvg

And, because CFLs are theoretically recyclable, there’s no reason that the mercury in them should be released. We currently only recycle 10% of CFLs in the US because we apparently enjoy numbness in the hands and feet, general muscle weakness, narrowing of the field of vision, damage to hearing and speech, insanity, paralysis, coma, and death, but other countries have higher rates demonstrating that it is possible if you’re not already too brain damaged to do it.

I know what you’re thinking: “What about LEDs? They’re even more efficient than CFLs, they have a longer life, and they don’t release neurotoxins into the air when they break.” Well, not so fast, Sparky. The problems with LEDs right now are 1) because of their longer life the total cost of ownership is comparable to CFLs, but they cost 15 to 30X more than CFLs up front and 2) while very efficient LEDs have been produced in the lab, the LEDs currently for sale are slightly less efficient than CFLs.

For the moment CFLs are still the best way to go. There is no longer any flicker or hum, and if you try you can find them with color rendering similar to incandescents. Look for a color temperature of 2700 K. To find out where you can recycle CFLs in your area go to Earth911 and search for “fluorescent light bulb.” Ikea and Home Depot take them, and there are lots of mail in programs.

:: EPA, 2002

Share

The System of Command

March 19th, 2009 by hana

The Greywater Powers That Be (or Be Not)

Red arrows indicate referral to another node of Greywater Power.

In our effort to design one of the first Passivhaus-certified residences in the country at “JJJ Ranch,” we are taking the same approach that we integrate into all of our high-performance natural building residential projects. In accordance with this holistic systems-design approach, we would like to incorporate a greywater system for landscape irrigation, in order to decrease potable water consumption for landscaping use, to improve the landscape and onsite food production quality, and to decrease the load on the sewer system.  At the outset of this research into the waste water policy of our State, we were already aware that the North Carolina 2006 Plumbing Code was the current code enacted at the state and county levels, and that this code defined greywater to be “waste water discharged from lavatories, bathtubs, showers, clothes washers and laundry sinks,” and that gray water was only to be used for flushing lavatories (not for irrigation). 2006 North Carolina Plumbing Code, Appendix C101

Our investigation into the existing code pertaining to a residential greywater system began by contacting the Buncombe County Permits and Inspection office. Our contact at this office sent us the 2009 Plumbing Code, in which there is detailed a greywater system for irrigation, much like an onsite septic field. When we inquired about the soil testing and approvals required within the code, this contact referred us to a Program Specialist at the Buncombe County Environmental Health Department, whose approval was necessary before a building permit could be approved. The Program Specialist informed us that a greywater irrigation system must be approved by the State Onsite Waste Water Department (under the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, DENR), and that OSWW would not approve such designs because waste water code does not distinguish between “black” and “grey” water—all must be hooked up to an approved septic system or field.

We then redirected our investigation to the state level and contacted the Plumbing Code Consultant under the NC Department of Insurance. This contact informed us that the design must be approved by DENR, and that they would most likely not approve it (again because Environmental codes do not distinguish between “black” and “grey” water). So, we contacted an Onsite Waste Water official under DENR. (Our email was intermediately redirected to a general Public Information Specialist at DENR, who referred us back to the Plumbing Code Consultant with whom we had spoken at the NC Department of Insurance.) The OSWW official that we had contacted informed us that we could either get approval through the OSWW Innovative & Experimental Systems Committee (under DENR) or through the Environmental Health Department, starting at the county level. The contact at I&E predicted that the design would not be approved, since the OSWW code does not recognize “grey” and “black” water separately, so we went back to the county level.

As we had already spoken to a Program Specialist at the Buncombe County Environmental Health Department, we contacted the Environmental Health Director, who after consulting with a Buncombe County Soils Specialist, informed us that the county is already approving the system described in the 2009 Plumbing Code, since any current building project would be finished after the code is to be enacted this coming summer.

So…it’s legal…?

Share

How Much Does a Shower Cost?

March 18th, 2009 by Seldom

A shower’s cost varies with water use, the cost of the water, inlet water temperature, the amount of energy used to heat the water, the cost of that energy, shower temperature, and sewer costs.

Imagine two neighbors. Each has a supply water temperature of 50°F, combined water/sewer charges of 0.28¢/gallon, electric rates of 8¢/ kWh, and gas rates of 60¢/therm. However, one has a low-flow showerhead on a water heater, and one has an old showerhead on an electric water heater. They both take 105°F showers, but because of the different water heaters and showerheads, the cost per minute of their showers differs by a factor of seven.

The neighbor with a low-flow showerhead rated at 2.5 gallons per minute (gpm) and a gas water heater with an Energy Factor (EF) of 0.6 can shower for just 1.6¢ per minute–0.9¢ for gas and 0.7¢ for water. The other neighbor, with an old 8 gpm showerhead and an electric water heater with an EF of 0.92, will pay almost 11¢ per minute for the shower–8.5¢ for electricity plus 2.2¢ for water.

During the time they run water to heat it up, they will both pay more per minute, since they will probably run all-hot water at a higher flow rate, perhaps running it at full blast through the tub spigot.

:: Home Energy Magazine

Share

The deKieffer Bypass

March 17th, 2009 by Seldom

The deKieffer Bypass is a transfer opening thru a wall behind the door trim. The top trim is blocked out 1/2″ on both sides, and a sheet metal boot keeps air from leaking into the wall cavity.

Fans of the deKieffer Bypass may also enjoy the Hofmeister Kink.

Share

Buying PV is a Dumb Use of Money

March 16th, 2009 by Seldom

Brad Templeton explains that you have to look at the bigger picture.

If you’re the sort of person who would put up a solar system, you probably already switched to CFL or other efficient lighting. Good. But you can do more. If you took a few hours of your time, and just six of your dollars, you could walk down the street in some town giving out CFL bulbs to people who would let you take out their old bulb and install the new one, making sure the bulb will really be effective. If you manage to get just 13 bulbs replaced that are used for just 3 hours per night, you’ve taken as much power off the grid as a $7,800 1000 watt PV panel. All for $40 and an hour or two of your time…

The bulbs stick out, but there are other things you can do. A new fridge, as noted, will save a lot of power. It’s surprising how bad fridges from the 80s and 90s are compared to those of 2009. Buying one for yourself actually saves you money, but you could even go out and buy new fridges for any neighbours who have models that are 15 to 20 years old, and it would still be better than putting that solar panel on your roof.

You could also buy people new gas dryers. Because gas has gone up they don’t save as much money as they used to, and they need a gas plumber to install, but they still beat the panels. Not buying one for yourself. I mean simply going to your neighbour and saying, “would you like a brand new gas dryer and the free services of a plumber at my expense to hook it up and toss out your electric one?” It’s a real win if you single out people with large families and lots of laundry. You could do even better if you convinced them to use a clothesline more, but that’s a harder sell. A new dryer is much easier.

::  Are Solar Panels a Wasteful Way to go Green?

Share

PV Price Declining Again

March 12th, 2009 by Seldom

For the last 40 years, every time the world production rate of PV doubles, the price falls by 18%.

However, the PV price drop stalled out in 2004 – mainly due to a shortage of silicon. Demand has been artificially inflated by government subsidies (mostly Germany), and the price of silicone went from $25/kg in 2003 to $400/kg in 2008.

Now prices are falling again. I’m sure it’s partially due to a recession induced drop in demand for computer chips and solar panels, but more silicon processing plants are also coming on line.

After hitting $4.20 a watt in the middle of 2008, solar panel prices have slid almost 30 percent to about $3 a watt, with research firm New Energy Finance predicting a further 20% drop this year.

PV prices are likely to continue dropping in months ahead. Renewable Energy World reported, “The cost of photovoltaic electricity is due to plummet in 2009, according to a new analysis by New Energy Finance. Its latest Silicon and Wafer Price Index shows average silicon contract prices falling by more than 30% in 2009 compared with 2008. . . . Furthermore, with thin-film PV module manufacturing costs approaching the $1/watt mark, crystalline silicon-based PV will come under severe competition for larger projects, resulting in margins shrinking throughout the silicon value chain, the company argues. . . . This may pressure crystalline silicon module manufacturers to reduce selling prices . . . $4/watt could drop to $2.60/watt by the end of 2009.

Keep in mind, this is for the PV panels themselves. For residential sized systems the costs break down roughly like this:

$4 PV modules
$1 Inverter
$1 Installation
$2 Balance of system (wiring, disconnects, etc.)
$8 per watt installed

:: Green Building Advisor

Share

Furnace Free in Vermont

March 11th, 2009 by Seldom

In 1998 Marc Rosenbaum was working on a 22 unit cohousing development in Harland, VT. Amory Lovins told the client that she should build a passive solar house without any backup heat. Marc didn’t buy it, and they went back and forth discussing how it could be done. Then Marc published their correspondence at BuildingGreen.com. It’s definitely worth reading.

:: The Furnace-free House in Vermont

Share

The System of Command

March 10th, 2009 by hana

The Greywater Powers That Be (or Be Not)

Red arrows indicate referral to another node of Greywater Power.

Share

Drainage Planes, Tyvek and Building Paper

March 10th, 2009 by Seldom

Required reading for building science aficionados:

  1. Drainage Planes and Air Spaces
  2. Brick, Stucco, Housewrap and Building Paper
Share